Eloquent Awakening

A very brief Introduction into the topics to this subject Formal Integralism

Systems science is an interdisciplinary field that studies the nature of systems—from simple to complex—in nature, society, cognition, and science itself. To systems scientists, the world can be understood as a system of systems.

• Principles Of Systems Science

“If we’re looking at the highlights of human development, you have to look at the evolution of the organism and then at the development of its interaction with the environment. Evolution of the organism will begin with the evolution of life perceived through the hominid coming to the evolution of mankind. Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon man. Now, interestingly, what you’re looking at here are three strings: biological, anthropological -development of the cities (smart cities- and cultural, which is human expression.

Now, what you’ve seen here is the evolution of populations, not so much the evolution of individuals. And in addition, if you look at the time scales that are involved here — two billion years for life, six million years for the hominid, 100,000 years for mankind as we know it — you’re beginning to see the telescoping nature of the evolutionary paradigm. And then when you get to agricultural, when you get to scientific revolution and industrial revolution, you’re looking at 10,000 years, 400 years, 150 years. You’re seeing a further telescoping of this evolutionary time. What that means is that as we go through the new evolution, it’s gonna telescope to the point we should be able to see it manifest itself within our lifetime, within this generation.

The new evolution stems from information, and it stems from two types of information: digital and analog. The digital is artificial intelligence. The analog results from molecular biology, the cloning of the organism. And you knit the two together with neurobiology. Before on the old evolutionary paradigm, one would die and the other would grow and dominate. But under the new paradigm, they would exist as a mutually supportive, noncompetitive grouping. Okay, independent from the external.

And what is interesting here is that evolution now becomes an individually centered process, emanating from the needs and desires of the individual, and not an external process, a passive process where the individual is just at the whim of the collective. So, you produce a neo-human, okay, with a new individuality and a new consciousness. But that’s only the beginning of the evolutionary cycle because as the next cycle proceeds, the input is now this new intelligence. As intelligence piles on intelligence, as ability piles on ability, the speed changes. Until what? Until we reach a crescendo in a way could be imagined as an enormous instantaneous fulfillment of human? human and neo-human potential. It could be something totally different. It could be the amplification of the individual, the multiplication of individual existences. Parallel existences now with the individual no longer restricted by time and space.

And the manifestations of this neo-human-type evolution, manifestations could be dramatically counter-intuitive. That’s the interesting part. The old evolution is cold. It’s sterile. It’s efficient, okay? And its manifestations of those social adaptations. We’re talking about parasitism, dominance, morality, okay? Uh, war, predation, these would be subject to de-emphasis. These will be subject to de-evolution. The new evolutionary paradigm will give us the human traits of truth, of loyalty, of justice, of freedom. These will be the manifestations of the new evolution. And that is what we would hope to see from this. That would be

~Wisdom Let Us Attend~

What is Formal Integralism?

1. Information gathered and compiled for a collective/mutual understanding and mutual liberation.
2. Part political science due to Platos Republic / Aristotle, and part philosophy of science as the ethic of government.
3. Formal Integralism is a Meta philosophy. Philosophy of philosophy, for a universal science; The art of science as critical theory *(Meta-Idealism design as the collective representation. The host of Formal Integralism is based on collective social science VS a personal bias or a selective majority endeavour.
4. A marriage between Western and Eastern thought interpreting Panta Rhei, the Tao and mysticism as the Logos being the system science for humanity and rebirth phycology.

1. Formal Integralism uses an economics approach to philosophy using utility to measure happiness. The science of scarcity.

2. Formal Integralism is a meta design to ethics (Neuro-ethics)

“Formal Integralism – Information Integration. A unified theory of the senses and the all becoming ethics. For a unified understanding. The universal science “

The word Formal was chosen specifically to put into perspective the language of science and technology {logic}.

• Language is positional as a semiotic conduit from relation to subject

• A non-closed system of recentralization

Conjectures:

1. Creative thinking rather than derivative

2. Practicality rather than theoretical

3. Descriptivism rather than prescriptivism

4. ‘Aboutness’ rather than ‘Ought To Be’

5. Objective rather than reductive

6. Introspective rather than inductive

7. Negation rather than certainty

8. Null-Hypothesis/Whorfian hypothesis as the method of negation

9. Cosmogony as a unified sense of our quantificational schemata

10. Affective-Neuro-Ethics

11. Science as a orthopraxis of humanity

*Ethics: In game theory the Colititional is to cooperate. Rather than the art of argumentation. There is emphasis to the art of negotiation.

With the rise of Technopoly (technology), one of those thought-worlds disappears. Technology eliminates alternatives to itself in precisely the way Aldous Huxley outlined in Brave New World. It does not make them illegal. It does not make them immoral. It does not even make them unpopular. It makes them invisible and therefore irrelevant. And it does so by redefining what we mean by religion, by art, by family, by politics, by history, by truth, by privacy, by intelligence, so that our definitions fit its new requirements. Technopoly, in other words, is a political correct way of describing a totalitarian technocracy.

{Commentary}

In short I’m defining ethics, philosophy, and science with practicality. My philosophy I created Formal Integralism has three understandings creating the truth of humanity.

“National Science Foundation surveys of public attitudes and knowledge have consistently shown that the public has a positive view of science but has little scientific understanding. The greatest deficit remains the public’s understanding of the scientific method.”

Philosophy of science emerged as a distinct discipline only in the middle of the 20th century in the wake of the logical positivism movement.

Science is an inherently communal activity which can only be done as part of a community. Society is drowning in information but starving for wisdom.

~The scientific explanation is the best explanation.And its methods are truer to the heart than anything imaginary. Built on the very foundations of faith, and reason.

• Ethics and economics as Political philosophy of science

• The Platonic science interpreted as early computer science. Craft as a medium between the head and the heart {the semiosis of the existential subconscious}.
• Logic is the Logos being both the Intuitive and scientific method (Holon); this is the collective formal science for formal Altruism and Frugality.

• The universe as an ecosystem

“Science is a peace treaty for our collective existential minds and a tool for democracy defining the common experience.”

-These short rough draft essays are just a glimpse into Formal Integralism. Providing a story mode approach, to better grasp the allegations-